Hedge fund to profit from 'market-moving' scoops
By running its own publication and newsroom and employing its own journalists, Hunterbrook Capital wants to get the stories first, then place market bets.
Two investors want to re-invent news. And it’s the worst journalism idea I’ve heard in a long time.
Nathaniel Brooks Horwitz and Sam Koppelman — both 27 years old — are creating a newsroom that will be monetized by investments based on “scoops” produced by the newsroom, according to exclusive reporting by the Financial Times.
In other words, their investment firm, the $100 million hedge fund Hunterbrook Capital, is using journalists to write stories designed to affect the stock market. They’ll buy or sell stock based on those “market-moving” stories before the market moves — before other investors know about the stories — thereby profiting.
If this feels wrong, it clearly is. Imagine them doing the same thing, hiring journalists, gathering the information, then not publishing the “stories.” This practice — hiring journalists to do investment research — is somewhat common. That would be similar to current investment, where information is gathered, research is done, then investments made based on what was learned. That would be ethical.
The cheat-code here is that that profit-taking results not from knowledge, but action that changes prices. They are placing bets on market changes, then actively and deliberately changing the market themselves.
The investors hawk their scam with virtue signaling about funding journalism. But their model isn’t about funding journalism for an informed democracy. It’s about funding journalism to change stock prices. (They claim journalists will not be directed by the investment arm and will be free to write other stories that won’t be traded on. But reporters will know their purpose and will be given bonuses when their stories result in profitable trades. Their incentives are not journalistic incentives.)
Journalists will be tasked with investigating companies and writing “scoops,” but without using any information that isn’t already public. In other words, Hunterbrook doesn’t know what a “scoop” is.
The reason they’ll use only publicly available information is that trading on non-public information is against the law.
So-called “compliance officers” will check stories to make sure all the information in them is publically available.
Which is why they shouldn’t call “journalism” designed for investors to profit from advanced knowledge of the “stories” “journalism,” nor should they refer to their market-manipulating content as “scoops.”
Mike’s List of Must-Read Stories
China plans to change the outcome of US elections using AI
Apple plans to build spatial computing into regular monitors
Google Books is indexing AI-generated garbage
AI has lost its magic
Fire, water and poison in the Library of Alexandria
Mike’s List of Moments
Phrase of the moment: "running out of internet"
AI concept of the moment: "generative synesthesia"
Marketing idea of the moment: "sponsored AR filters"
AI branch of the moment: “machine unlearning”
AI comment of the moment: "No sentience. No cusp of sentience. No glimmer of sentience. Not even a teensy-weensy bit of sentience."
Car feature of the moment: "organic auditory feedback"
Mike’s List of Shameless Self-Promotions
Kill meetings (before meetings kill your company)
How will the Merck settlement affect the insurance industry?
The future of work looks like sci-fi
Read ELGAN.COM for more!
Mike’s Location: Oaxaca, Mexico
(Why Mike is always traveling.)