Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Howard Salmon's avatar

This gets to the heart of the problem: AI isn’t persuasive because it’s intelligent, it’s persuasive because it’s affective. Once images replace words, reason is optional. The historical parallel to “spinster” rhetoric is especially telling—same emotional lever, just automated and amplified. The closing question is the right one: not “is this real?” but “what am I being pushed to feel, and why?” That’s the literacy gap we haven’t caught up to yet.

No posts

Ready for more?